In June 2026 the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published Migratory Big Game: A Framework for Conservation Action.
Bringing together federal, state, Tribal, and local partners across 17 western states, the Framework corresponds with and is supported by the Western Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA). Taking an integrated approach, the Framework focuses on aligning resources and conservation practices across public and private lands to address threats to big game like elk, mule deer, and pronghorn.
To accomplish this, the Migratory Big Game Framework establishes a strategy to coordinate Farm Bill and other USDA resources to ensure that state and Tribal wildlife priorities are translated into effective, on-the-ground action across all big game habitats. This includes Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) programs, such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP), and Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP), as well as the Farm Service Agency’s (FSA) Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), which has the potential to connect thousands of acres.
The three main strategies outlined to address threats to big game like elk, pronghorn, and mule deer include:
- Protecting Habitat and Connectivity: Voluntary conservation easements and CRP contracts help keep working lands intact, preventing fragmentation from development and securing movement corridors for future generations.
- Reducing Barriers to Movement: Modernizing fences is a centerpiece of the strategy, replacing hazardous designs with wildlife-friendly alternatives and, where possible, removing fencing entirely. The Framework also highlights emerging solutions like virtual fencing, which reduces conflicts between livestock management and wildlife migration while lowering costs for producers.
- Improving Habitat Quality: Actions include controlling invasive annual grasses, removing encroaching conifers, restoring mesic (wet) habitats, and improving forest health to boost forage and habitat quality on summer and winter ranges. These steps strengthen rangeland resilience, reduce wildfire risk, and maintain reliable water and forage sources critical to livestock and wildlife alike.
States include: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Several initiatives and policies provide the foundation for this Framework, including:
- Working Lands for Wildlife (WLWF) – USDA’s premier approach for conserving America’s working lands to benefit people, wildlife, and rural communities through voluntary, incentive-based conservation
- Three existing Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW) frameworks in the Sagebrush Biome, Great Plains Grasslands, and Northern Bobwhite, Grasslands and Savannas
- Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA) Wildlife Movement and Connectivity Initiative
- Western Governors’ Association Resolutions (such as 2024-03, 2021-03, 2019-08, and 07-01) to establish a regional mandate for protecting connectivity.
- 2024 USDA-WAFWA Memorandum of Understanding to establish a formal relationship between state-led conservation priorities and federal program delivery
- Secretarial Order 3362 “Improving Habitat Quality in Western Big Game Winter Range and Migration Corridors”
Please note: This digest is intended to provide up-to-date information on policy development from a neutral, unaffiliated position as it relates to connectivity and corridor science and management.
Related Posts
USDA’s new framework for migratory big game conservation
The Migratory Big Game Framework aims to coordinate USDA resources in order to protect habitat and connectivity, reduce barriers to movement, and improve habitat quality for elk, pronghorn, mule deer, and more.
Connectivity matters during climate extremes
Extreme snowfall in Wyoming forced pronghorn to make long-distance escape movements, but encounters with fences and highways significantly increased mortality, highlighting the need for connectivity planning beyond seasonal migrations.
Human activity disrupts functional connectivity
Movement paths from tracked mule deer in Utah show that urbanization affects not only whether a corridor is used, but how it is used as well.
