Identifying key connections for migratory marine animals

2025-07-03T11:42:15-04:00June 16th, 2025|Corridors Science, Digests|
 

Migratory species are ubiquitous across all taxonomic groups. However, many migratory species are currently in decline.

For migratory marine species in particular, almost half of all species are listed as threatened, near threatened, or data deficient. With nearly two-thirds of the ocean classified as international waters, and therefore largely unprotected, marine migratory animals face the daunting problem of traversing potentially unsafe waters.

While it’s clear that connected habitats are critical for migratory species, migratory animals present a unique management problem. Their migratory routes often cross national boundaries, meaning countries must work together to protect and conserve migratory species.

Bentley, L.K., Nisthar, D., Fujioka, E., Curtice, C., DeLand, S.E., Donnelly, B., Harrison, A.L., Heywood, E.I., Kot, C.Y., Ortuño Crespo, G. and Poulin, S. 2025. Marine megavertebrate migrations connect the global ocean. Nature Communications 16(1): 4089.

While we know that migratory species are in decline, we do not have sufficient, easily accessible data on most animals’ migratory cycles for managers and policymakers to coordinate protections between countries.

In a new review, researchers sought to fill this gap between science, management, and policy by identifying key habitats and the corridors linking them for over 100 migratory marine species. They gathered and synthesized a data set of over 5,000 migration sites (areas where significant activities occur, like foraging or breeding) and migration routes for 40 seabirds, 34 fish, and 28 marine mammals. The data set, Migratory Connectivity in the Ocean, is free and available at www.mico.eco.

Researchers found that countries, on average, were connected to 28 other jurisdictions by migratory marine species. Ectotherms (fish and sea turtles) generally connected tropical areas, whereas endotherms (sea birds and mammals) moved between the tropics and the poles.

Migration sites were grouped geographically by taxon. The explanation for this geographic clustering is also taxon-dependent. For example, sea turtle migration sites were grouped around the tropics, which matches their geographic distribution. However, seabird migration sites were grouped in polar regions, which is likely due to a bias towards seabird research in these areas.

This dataset represents a baseline of the minimum extent of connectivity needed between sites for migratory marine animals, and is a step towards meeting the mandate for an atlas of animal migrations given to the Convention on Migratory Species. However, this data set is just a start: biases in the data, like an over representation of age and sex classes that are easier to track, point towards a need for more information on lesser known species that are still ecologically important.

Identifying key migration sites and routes is an important development in providing protected, connected habitats for migratory species. With data in hand on important migration sites for animals, policy makers can target those areas for protections. Data on migration cycles for marine animals is a key piece of the puzzle in creating effective networks of protected areas. With their need for cross-boundary protections, migratory species remind us that conservation is a global effort.

Related Posts

Hybridization mitigates climate change risks for birds

November 18th, 2025|

Research on mountain birds shows that hybridization among species boosts their ability to adapt to rapid climate change, highlighting how natural corridors and gene flow can strengthen resilience in vulnerable high elevation ecosystems.

About the Author:

Alice Dykstra is the Communications Specialist at Conservation Corridor. She received her PhD from Michigan State University in 2024 where she studied landscape-scale strategies for conserving insect biodiversity.
Go to Top