
Photo: Gabriel Oppler
2024 was another successful year for the Connectivity Conservation Specialist Group (CCSG). Through direct outreach and word of mouth, 30 new members from 15+ countries joined CCSG. Membership now exceeds 1000 individuals. Collectively, across CCSG and its four working groups, some of our major contributions leading science, policy, and best-practice for ecological connectivity conservation included:
- In February, CCSG leadership and members were in Samarkand, Uzbekistan for the 14th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Migratory Species. Among the agenda items, the conference adopted the Samarkand Strategic Plan for 2024-2032 with Goal 2 devoted to maintaining and restoring connectivity, and at least eight additional policy decisions were made to update and focus related efforts such as ecological networks, impact assessment, infrastructure development, flyways, and vessel strikes for marine megafauna. Furthermore, 25+ side events addressed the topic, including “New Frontiers for Ecological Connectivity – From Policy to Implementation”. A special event on 14 February celebrated launch of the new Global Partnership on Ecological Connectivity (GPEC) with the aim of strengthening and facilitating key priorities among institutions and organizations (More details at: https://conservationcorridor.org/ccsg/2024/03/cms-cop14/);
- In October, CCSG was active further elevating understanding and implementation of connectivity in support of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) during the 16th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD/CoP-16). With one official event co-organized with GPEC on “Ecological Connectivity: A Key to Powering Delivery of the KMGBF”attracting 130+ participants and others focused on avoiding and mitigating the impacts of linear infrastructure, CCSG’s contributions to side events emphasized the great diversity of related initiatives, projects, and activities already underway around the world that are driving implementation. Prior to the start of the conference, a News post on the CCSG website provided insights and background documentation about ongoing efforts and opportunities (More details at: https://conservationcorridor.org/ccsg/2024/12/ccsg-overview-of-outcomes-from-cbd-cop-16/);
- “Ground truthing” workshops for advancing the IUCN Connectivity Guidelines were held in Quebec in spring and summer for two out of three identified corridors: Gaspésie, Mauricie, and Plaisance-to-Tremblant (P2T), as well as in Uzbekistan at the end of the year to enhance conservation of the Koytendag State Nature Reserve in Turkmenistan and Surkhan State Nature Reserve in Uzbekistan and as a contribution to a project working toward the eventual nomination of the transboundary landscape as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
- Gary Tabor, Chair and Jodi Hilty, Deputy Chair presented, and members of CCSG supported planning and convening, at the Northeastern North America (NENAM) / Turtle Island Landscape Connectivity Summit in June in Montreal. The event brought together a unique mix of 175 government, Tribal and First Nation, NGO, academic, and other leaders and practitioners across the US/Canada border to chart a path forward for an ecologically and culturally well-connected landscape for all inhabitants of this region. The outcomes are currently being compiled into a high-level, regional connectivity “road map” to help guide collaborative efforts across borders.
CCSG published technical guidance and advice and disseminated these resources across the globe. Notable examples included:
- Version 1.0: Practical Guidance on Indicators of Connectivity for the KMGBF which was produced to provide summaries and technical information about identified and relevant indicators in the monitoring framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework;
- An overview of Ecological Connectivity in Updated NBSAPs, released as a compilation of related plans, specific language, and links available up to September 2024;
- An information note with recommendations that to best address identified gaps related to connectivity in the KMGBF monitoring framework, Parties adopt disaggregations of “By level of connectivity” for the current headline indicators“A.2 Extent of natural ecosystems” and “3.1 Coverage of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures”; and
- A list with excerpts of “Landscape, Seascape, and Connectivity Conservation: Related Resolutions and Recommendations Adopted by the 2020 IUCN World Conservation Congress” released in preparation for IUCN WCC 2025.
Furthermore, CCSG continued to increase communication and outreach to the public:
- As part of the WildlifeConnect Initiative, we launched the online, self-paced course “Connectivity 101: Ecological connectivity for people and planet”.
- Members of the Marine Connectivity Working Group published the article “Marine connectivity conservation: Guidance for MPA and MPA network design and management” and the article “From oceans apart to the global ocean: Including marine connectivity in global conservation targets“.
- Members of the Latin America and Caribbean Transport Working Group published the article “Ando volando bajo” and “Unveiling the hidden impact: Wildlife roadkill assessment in the Paraguayan Chaco”.
- CCSG continued to contribute to a series of Connectivity Policy Digests, including on national policies in Kazakhstan and Brazil.
- We continued to add to the list of CCSG Publications, the webpage “Ecological connectivity in international policy”, and “Connectivity News” webpage.
The CCSG Secretariat is grateful for contributions from many members in making these accomplishments possible. We look forward to another fantastic year in 2025!

Photo: Gabriel Oppler